I am
not averse to activities, but the problem is that whenever I proceed with my
teaching via them, I feel guilty. It’s because some students just hang around
along the way, not involved in group working or discussion. The other is that
activities are always time-consuming. In a 50-minute period, activity process
always do not flow smoothly and efficiently. As a result, I try as safe a way
as I can, teacher-centered approach. However, deep in my heart, I know a
language classroom should be more than a teacher’s show; it
should be a stage for learners to perform. A teacher is nothing more than a
director. But I lack a clear script on how to direct.
The tasks of week 5 triggered chemistry.
While I was working with the tasks, I actually expected nothing until I kicked
off my experiment. The first time, I only prepared pieces of paper so that
students could work on the assigned tasks. The stark difference was that I
asked students to bring their own laptops, smart phones, or tablet computers.
The outcome went beyond my expectation. What amazed me most was that none of
them was hanging around in the process; everyone was absorbed in the activity:
some of them had been easily distracted or even snoozing in class. It was elated
to see them “come back” to classroom learning (I had an impulse to take a video
to record that incredulous behavior change). But one glitch was that they still
procrastinated. Then I pondered how to direct “the play” efficiently. I thought
the activity would gain efficiency if rubrics fell into place. I drafted the
rubrics, and then overhauled them three times.
Right before the second-time experiment, I tried
to make the rubrics as explicit as I could, making a demo, and then students
initiated their tasks, which went from strength to strength. It was a great
success—students were involved, no group procrastinating, the assigned task done
with alacrity.
Personally, the task is success because
technology as an incentive is applied to their learning. For example, smart
phones are gadgets for them to play games only, and what’s more, they are
impossible to use in class. But when the students were asked to use something
forbidden in class to facilitate their learning, the novelty must have played a
significant role. Besides, they were well acquainted with game rules. When the
rubric was projected onto the screen, I could feel the awe in their eyes. Presumably,
they were clearly informed of the objectives and the procedures of the tasks.
In addition, one of the tasks’ objectives was to find example sentences from
news reports and then translate them into Chinese. Many groups selected news
headlines about MBA, whose star players are well known to them. Way different
from example sentences made up by the teacher, those sentences were authentic
and entertaining, their motivation being aroused.
I am pleased to say the experiment turns
the corner in my teaching. Then next, I am posed to perform experiments on
writing, and reading. I know it will take up much of my time, but having taught
for almost 20 years, seeing many of my colleagues’ passion for teaching dispelling,
I feel so blessed.
Chengkuo
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing your thoughts. I have seen many teachers stick to the safe road. I myself do that I am sure when it comes to certain parts of my teaching. Still if we are to grow and to keep teaching fresh, we need to venture into the unknown now and again, try something new.
Robert